Our website is made possible by displaying non-intrusive online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling or pausing your ad blocker.
Why PN17? EY has been appointed. Whether KPMG consented to the condition of acceptance of EY is beyond SD's control. If KPMG insists, SC or Bursa should ban KPMG instead of reprimand SD
Why? It's not by order of SC.. Merely request from EY... KPMG has right not to release their working paper to outsiders other than local authorities.. Right?
SD cannot just be the party on the receiving end and left to the wimps and fancy of KPMG hiding behind 'professionalism'. SD has every right to prove their case through legal means. If KPMG is to be proven at fault, they cannot continue to hide behind while investors and SD loss millions
Why need to pay? KPMG has duty to report to SC, by law, as mentioned by SC. KPMG didn't say anything at public.. Its the investors takes a risk adverse approach only.. What's going to do with KPMG?
A wife went to cafe with a friend. The husband queried the wife. The wife try to talk to the husband but husband refuse to discuss on table. The wife hurt so much. Then the wife went to find counsellor. The counsellor ask the wife to take action in the hope that the husband will come to discuss properly. But the husband say divorce and see you in court.
