When you opened your big mouth during the takeover period, the 100-year opportunity was already gone, hahaha:) Another 100-year opportunity was in 2020, just before the first announcement of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccines. I predicted Pfizer would be successful and even knew the announcement date! Buying at the historic lows (twice only over the past five years) so that I need not worry about a takeover or you, hahaha:)

Why? You knew how to catch some RM1.46-47 GENM shares in April, 2025--I think not, hahaha:)

None of these stocks have a successful business model or good management (e.g., political SCIB). At least Focus mothers are 0.5¢ now with high margins. The Arch Galeries will strengthen Focus's financial future further! For example, the parking fee was RM20/hr. Assuming a full house for 8 hours/day, the potential cash flow—without doing anything—is 1,000 (car parks) x RM20/hr x 8 hr/day x 30 days = RM4.8M/month or RM57.6M/year, not to mention the EV charging fees and the expensive shop rent!

Your exact quote from 1,571 days ago: "Focus will rebound !!!" when Focus mothers were at 5¢ (i.e., not 0.5¢). Not only did your Focus mother not follow my first principle—0.5¢ and cash cow—you were all over other non-first-principle stocks like SCIB, FINTEC, SG, KANGER, and ERDASON, etc. So, how could you not be broke now? And now you want to offer a funny comment about my 0.5¢ mothers when you bought yours for 5¢ or above?

Yes, that is what "net" means, and not just land!

Google AI:
"As of late 2025 and entering 2026, Genting Singapore (GenS) continues to be the dominant contributor to Genting Berhad's (GENT) Net Tangible Assets (NTA), often valued higher than the parent company's entire market capitalization."

I am very good at criticizing PhD students' academic references, so better Google a good one—no pressure, hahaha:)

If you had money, you would not publish your scam ads, hahaha:) Do not know how to use Google Search or AI, so you are getting very, very mad, hahaha:) I can always say I spend $10M per day in Japan, hahaha:)

"3. 建议关注的事实指标
在评估这类“高负债、高品牌”的公司时，建议您通过以下权威渠道核实真正的“事实”：
资产负债率与现金短债比：通过 巨潮资讯网 查看公司最新的财报，确认650亿负债中，多少是短期借款，公司手头现金是否覆盖未来一年的利息和到期债务。
受限资产：核实公司账面资产中，有多少已被抵押。如果大部分资产已抵押，所谓的“每股价值”在清偿时将优先归于债权人。
经营性现金流：确认“赚钱能力”是否真的如血液般流入，还是仅仅是账面上的应收账款。
总结： 该段文字更像是一篇带有恐慌情绪的评论，而非严谨的财务分析。它将“品牌估值”与“债务规模”进行简单对冲，忽略了资产质量、债务结构以及法律清偿顺序等核心事实。"

"2. 误导性逻辑 (Misleading Logic)

负债与分红的关系：文中称“你有能力偿还债务，股东才有的分红”。事实上，即使公司有能力还债，如果现金流紧张或处于亏损状态，法律和公司章程通常也禁止或不建议分红。还债能力不等于分红能力。

品牌价值归零：文中称“公司进入困境的时候品牌价值归零”。这过于绝对。许多陷入财务危机的公司（如破产重整的企业），其品牌依然具有特许权价值，可以被拍卖或授权，并非直接归零。

“小股东永远都是那个菜”：这是典型的社交媒体情绪化语言（如雪球等平台常见的言论），而非理性的金融分析。"

Google AI:
在您提供的这段分析中，存在多处非事实性陈述、逻辑误导以及情感化表达。为了帮助您理清投资思路，以下是针对这些内容的详细拆解：

1. 非事实/缺乏依据的陈述 (Non-facts)

“品牌价值就占有了60亿”：品牌价值在财务报表上通常体现为“无形资产”或“商誉”，但这些数值往往是基于并购时的溢价或第三方机构的估值，并非变现价值。在公司陷入财务困境时，品牌价值往往会迅速缩水，不能简单地从市值中扣除来衡量公司剩余价值。

“8.17每股价值是有这个价值”：这一说法具有误导性。股价（市场价值）与每股净资产（账面价值）是两个概念。如果公司负债高达650亿且面临流动性危机，其账面上的资产（如存货、地产）可能需要折价变现，每股清算价值可能远低于8.17元。

“当有好价钱的时候，应该收割75%以上”：这属于主观的策略建议或情绪化表达，并非市场事实。